protocol and run ledger

Mini PC Homelab Benchmark Ledger

Inspect the benchmark protocol, queued questions, accepted runs, and the honest current count of Grade-A Super Evil Robots measurements.

record type
hub

record at a glance

accepted runs
0
protocol records
3
method-ready, unexecuted
3
measured results
0
critical facts resolved
60/70
best attached evidence
grade B
accepted grade A runs
0

the current ledger is intentionally empty

A benchmark appears here only after the exact hardware and software manifests, frozen fixture and protocol hashes, repeated raw series, privacy review, and human approval all exist. The site currently has three predeclared, method-ready protocols and no accepted run.

0 Grade A runs · 0 accepted records.

No compatibility verdict may claim measured Super Evil Robots evidence from this ledger yet.

critical-fact readiness

The generated entity evidence-reference presence counter asks only whether each evaluated top-level entity has at least one reference. It is not consequential-fact coverage. This fact ledger currently resolves 60 of 70 separately declared facts. Its source-suitable coverage is 85.7%, and 14.3% remain unresolved. Gate G2 requires at least 90% source coverage and no more than 10% unresolved.

application

20/20 resolved

0 unresolved critical facts.

physical configuration

0/10 resolved

10 unresolved critical facts.

platform

20/20 resolved

0 unresolved critical facts.

workload

20/20 resolved

0 unresolved critical facts.

Modeled installed parts never count as observed physical facts. That is why all physical-configuration facts remain unresolved until hash-pinned, human-approved Grade A runs exist.

protocol queue

ready unexecuted · 1.0.0

physical mini-PC baseline protocol

Measure the baseline power, thermal, acoustic, boot, memory, network, failure, and recovery behavior required before workload-specific results are interpreted.

measurement families
9
planned repetitions
3
result
none accepted
download the baseline method →

ready unexecuted · 1.0.0

Jellyfin 1080p H.264 hardware-transcode protocol

Test whether one declared exact configuration can sustain one repeatable 1080p H.264 to 720p H.264 Jellyfin hardware transcode without thermal, playback, or operational failure.

fixture
selected-hash-pinned
planned repetitions
3
measurement window
30 minutes
result
none accepted for this protocol hash
inspect protocol and result ledger →

ready unexecuted · 1.0.0

Home Assistant synthetic event and restart protocol

Test whether one declared exact configuration can sustain a deterministic synthetic event load and recover cleanly from a controlled Home Assistant restart.

fixture
selected-local-hash-pinned
planned repetitions
3
event load
30 minutes
result
none accepted
download the recovery method →

what a Grade A record must contain

  • One exact specimen identity plus complete hardware and firmware manifests.
  • Operating system, kernel, drivers, runtime, application, and configuration versions.
  • A legally usable fixture with stable URL and SHA-256.
  • A frozen protocol, raw artifacts, at least three repetitions, and disclosed failures.
  • Median, range, variation, limitations, privacy review, and human approval.

read the full evidence and benchmark method →

receipts

7 sources · 0 accepted grade A runs · best evidence grade B · reviewed 2026-07-26

record identity, publication and review

canonical path
/benchmarks/
publication
preview · noindex
reviewed
2026-07-26
review again by
2026-08-25

evidence boundary

Grade A count: 0. A Grade B source can establish a documented specification or requirement. Grade D records are modeling inputs. Neither is proof of measured throughput, thermals, power, reliability, or physical fit.

8 attached evidence records

a grade describes how well attested a statement is, not how good the hardware is. grade a is a lab run we reproduced with a published method. grade d is a model, a reasoned inference, or a single unverified report.

  1. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    Jellyfin recommends 8 GB RAM, SSD storage for application data and transcode cache, wired gigabit networking, and properly configured hardware acceleration for transcoding.

    source: Jellyfin hardware selection guidechecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-jellyfin-hardware-requirements

  2. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    Jellyfin publishes an official Debian-based container image and documents 10.11 tags, but does not establish the pilot's additional KVM guest layer.

    source: Jellyfin container installationchecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-jellyfin-container-deployment

  3. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    Jellyfin 10.11 is a documented stable server release line and requires a 64-bit operating system on ARM.

    source: Jellyfin 10.11.0 release noteschecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-jellyfin-10-11-release

4 further grade b records · official source
  1. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    Jellyfin says Intel 7th through 10th generation integrated graphics remain capable for existing owners, but are no longer recommended for a new purchase because Intel deprecated the relevant toolkit.

    source: Jellyfin hardware selection guidechecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-jellyfin-legacy-intel-guidance

  2. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    The generic x86-64 Home Assistant OS image requires x86-64, UEFI boot, compatible storage, and a supported network adapter; Secure Boot must be disabled.

    source: Home Assistant OS generic x86-64 board supportchecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-haos-generic-x86-requirements

  3. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    Home Assistant documents a KVM/Proxmox QCOW2 deployment with minimum VM resources of 2 GB RAM and 2 vCPUs, requires UEFI, and directs KVM users to a non-Secure-Boot OVMF image. The example KVM command allocates 4 GB, while the guide says resources should be sized to the expected workload rather than asserting a universal higher recommendation.

    source: Home Assistant OS virtual-machine installationchecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-haos-vm-requirements

  4. evidence grade b · official sourcesupports

    The official July 2026 release notes list Home Assistant Core patch release 2026.7.4.

    source: Home Assistant 2026.7 release noteschecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-haos-release-2026-7-4

1 further grade d record · modeled or inferred
  1. evidence grade d · modeled or inferredsupports

    Resource allocations in candidate recipes and the starter stack are planning budgets, not measured throughput or latency claims.

    source: Super Evil Robots Repositioning Master Planchecked 2026-07-26claim: claim-ser-workload-budget-model

    limitation: This is a modeled or inferred claim. It cannot establish measured performance.

source ledger

Official facts and first-party modeling are shown separately. Source prose, tables, and diagrams are not republished.

  • 7 sources
  • 6 with a public link
  • 1 first party modeling policy
  • 4 official application documentation
  • 2 official release notes
first party modeling policy · 1 source
  1. Super Evil Robots Repositioning Master PlanSuper Evil Robots · first party modeling policy · checked 2026-07-26 · docs/super-evil-robots-repositioning-plan.md
official application documentation · 4 sources
  1. Jellyfin hardware selection guideJellyfin Project · official application documentation · checked 2026-07-26
  2. Jellyfin container installationJellyfin Project · official application documentation · checked 2026-07-26
  3. Home Assistant OS generic x86-64 board supportOpen Home Foundation · official application documentation · checked 2026-07-26
  4. Home Assistant OS virtual-machine installationOpen Home Foundation · official application documentation · checked 2026-07-26
official release notes · 2 sources
  1. Jellyfin 10.11.0 release notesJellyfin Project · official release notes · checked 2026-07-26
  2. Home Assistant 2026.7 release notesOpen Home Foundation · official release notes · checked 2026-07-26

record and source history

This projection is generated from homelab graph version 0.1.0. The generated lifecycle index exposes only history events that are explicitly present in the structured record. It does not invent an earlier revision when the graph contains only its creation baseline.

  1. — current preview record reviewed against the attached evidence set.
  2. — next required review under the monthly pilot-record review interval.
  3. This route does not map to one simple lifecycle entity. Inspect the generated index for its component records; no route-level revision is implied.

inspect the complete generated lifecycle and change-history index